A couple of
months ago, I was reading predictions from the noted Google futurist, Ray Kurzweil. Among
them was the prediction that nanobots would make people funnier. No, they’re not going to help you channel
George Carlin or Richard Pryor. They’re
going to connect you to the Internet.
That
notion, to me anyway, is both awe inspiring and terrifying. Wouldn’t it be great to have the vast information
reserves of the cloud at your mental fingertips? But wouldn’t it be horrific if that
information feed fell into the wrong hands?
There
are, of course, major hurdles in establishing a brain-to-cloud interface. One is knowing just where to insert these
nanobots into the brain so that their signals will be meaningful. Or maybe precise location is not required and
what is inserted is a mesh, much like the ‘neural lace’ being proposed by Elon
Musk’s new company, Neuralink. And of
course, the brain will be helping in this endeavor, making changes in its
structure to accommodate these new inputs – a capability known as plasticity.
When might we expect this revolution? A special edition of the NY Times, Science
Times crowd-sourced that question (http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/12/06/science/20111206-technology-timeline.html).
And after 1537 moves (when I visited on May 2, 2017), the readers
settled on 2034 as the date when “Enhanced
intelligence will be available to most people through a combination of nanotechnology
and embedded processors.”
I’d like to see
that. But in the meantime, I can
simulate nanobots making me funnier with a manual search of the
Internet. Here was what I found.
Question: Why was the nanobot bankrupt?
Answer: Because it had used all its cache.
I consider this
proof positive. Nanobots won’t make me
funnier, at least until there’s better material in the cloud.
No comments:
Post a Comment