The Killdeer
Connection is the story of lawyer David Thompson’s struggle to clear his name after
he is falsely accused of killing an acquaintance, Harold Salar. And when a possible link to terrorism comes
up, Thompson is fighting for his life.
One of his main clues? A cryptic
message in Salar’s will that says, ‘always follow the killdeer’ – a message
that has a host of meanings, both symbolic and literal.
Swyer is an excellent writer – one who is particularly adept at creating
visual descriptions that convey the underlying psychology of a situation, as
well as the physical scene. The initial meeting
at Baxter & Chadwick, lawyers for the oil industry, and at the oil field in
Williston, North Dakota, are particularly good examples. If there is a flaw in these descriptions,
it’s that they do tend to be overly long and in some cases, misplaced. The scene where Thompson and a friend, Jim,
are watching dust particles, until Jim chases them away with a hand is an
example of the latter issue. I had a
hard time picturing why anyone would be doing that.
Thompson as the protagonist was cast as the man who tried to do it all
himself, tending toward sarcasm and deceit as his tools. When he wasn’t making excuses or telling
half-truths to everyone from his wife to the FBI, he was preaching about the
dangers of transporting oil by rail – complete with statistics. True, it is dangerous, but he wasn’t
comparing its pros and cons against pipelines or alternative energy. He was sermonizing and those sections became
ponderous. By the end, Thompson was
transformed by his experiences…maybe.
But even at the conclusion, he was grandstanding and reveling in his moral
stands. I never came around to liking
him.
One of my biggest concerns, however, was that the plot was shaky. For example, physical evidence links Thompson
to the murder scene when he clears a spot and sits down near the body. While that is odd enough, at least two later
scenes have him running into the apartment holding his breath because the smell
is so bad, even though the body has been removed. The notion that the FBI would consider
Thompson a terrorist based on the evidence they had seemed ludicrous. That they would even think terrorism was a
motive given the nature of the crimes was not believable to start with. How could Salar have left the clues he
supposedly did when he was being accosted?
Why did Salar put Thompson in such an awkward position when his
objectives could have been accomplished many other ways? Etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment