Historical fiction is, obviously, part history and part story. Liberty
Boy did well in creating the look and feel of the period (the British
oppression and Robert Emmet’s uprising in 1803 Ireland), but the accompanying
fiction had the feel of a formulaic romance.
I was hoping for more.
Liberty Boy conveyed a
feeling of helplessness and oppression that seems appropriate to the period. The nature of home life, work, social
interactions, and political intrigue in this part of the world and time all
felt true. Simply put, the book made a
period in history that I knew little about come to life, as good historical
fiction will often do.
The pacing of the story was OK to a bit slow with some repetition or
unnecessary emphasis, and yet, the book was a quick read. Perhaps that’s because it’s relatively
short. Character development was
good. I particularly enjoyed Kitty Doyle,
who is brash, aggressive, and daring, which of course, stirs the pot in her
world. Development of Jimmy O'Flaherty,
on the other hand, started well, but by the end, he seemed both too good and too
rudderless to be real.
The plot that went with the history, however, was the primary
letdown for me. In general, it followed
a well-worn recipe for romances – keep the potential young lovers apart through
a series of misunderstandings, poor timing, and chance events to build
emotional tension. And then… Well, to finish that thought would give away
the ending, but it’s one of the two possible – they get together or they
don’t. But either way, the storyline
already felt stale.
No comments :
Post a Comment